Open_Micronational Open_Micronational
Open Forum for Micronationalists
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   fchat fChat   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

So Called "Defeat of Communism"

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Open_Micronational Forum Index -> Rants about Macronationals
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bitovia



Joined: 08 Aug 2007
Posts: 164
Location: Vadaz, C.R.B.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:14 pm    Post subject: So Called "Defeat of Communism" Reply with quote

This isn't a rant about any macronationalist in particular,as much as a critique many of all of them in the West, especially in the United States.

As many of you don't know, the Citizenry-Republic of Bitovia is an opponent of Communism (but let it be known that we wish no ill will on Lord Imperator and his country, or General Kervez and his country, as they're both pretty cool.

Why do so many marconationalists in the West say that communism has been defeated? I am aware of the fall of the Soviet Union, but there are several nations remaining today that have Communist doctrines, including:

The People's Republic of China
The Lao People Democratic Republic
The People's Democratic Republic of Korea
The Republic of Cuba
The Socialist Republic of Vietnam
The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Considering that all of these states still consider Communism their political ideology, why is it stated that NATO defeated Communism? If anything, NATO defeated the Soviet Union, and even now it's largest post-Soviet State, the Russian Federation, is adopting questionable doctrines (such as Putin's crackdown on media freedom), and many of President Putin's critics are mysteriously disappearing on visits to Moscow. Can anyone shed some light on this topic?
_________________
Regards,
Edward Wadas
Prime Minister of the Citizenry Republic of Bitovia
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BaronVonServers
Site Admin


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 2215
Location: Dominion of British West Florida

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Because each of them has moved to a mixed economy.
_________________
The most Honourable, the Marquess of Mobile, Bo Register
Her Majesty's Governor-General in and for
the Dominion of British West Florida
Dedicated to God-and-Crown Governance in the
former British Colony of West Florida.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Bitovia



Joined: 08 Aug 2007
Posts: 164
Location: Vadaz, C.R.B.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Although they call themselves mixed economies, it seems purely to be in foreign affairs, so they benefit through trade policies. As far as treatment of their citizens, private enterprise, military, freedoms such as speech, they remain Leninist or Stalinist states. (Except for Venezuela and Russia, but they are on a steady road to authoritarianism.)
_________________
Regards,
Edward Wadas
Prime Minister of the Citizenry Republic of Bitovia
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BaronVonServers
Site Admin


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 2215
Location: Dominion of British West Florida

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They have all returned to 'small scale free enterprise' - the Markets are Free even if the People are not.
_________________
The most Honourable, the Marquess of Mobile, Bo Register
Her Majesty's Governor-General in and for
the Dominion of British West Florida
Dedicated to God-and-Crown Governance in the
former British Colony of West Florida.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Lord Imperator



Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 2837
Location: Imperial Commonwealth of the Imperium of DeWaCo Estates

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The markets [ directly and indirectly ] drive ALL nations;
which will identify themselfs as whatever it is that the
leaderships are attempting to promote, for their own People,
as well as the People of other lands / govts. Idea

"Talk is Cheap"....and "Names are a Dime-a-Dozen"
[ to coin a few words ]


Govts will call themselfs, and associate themselfs, with
whatever and whoever will promote and protect their image. Idea

A Communist one day......a Capitalist the Next.
[ i.e. China.....a wolf dressed up as a sheep ] Wink Idea
_________________
Lord Imperator ~ CommiCzar

Peace & Prosperity




Imperial Commonwealth of the Imperium of DeWaCo Estates
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Bitovia



Joined: 08 Aug 2007
Posts: 164
Location: Vadaz, C.R.B.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can agree with that, wholeheartedly. I also think word-play in itself has a major role to play in this game of deception. (i.e. People's Democratic Republic of Korea: Not Democratic or a Republic)
_________________
Regards,
Edward Wadas
Prime Minister of the Citizenry Republic of Bitovia
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lord Imperator



Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 2837
Location: Imperial Commonwealth of the Imperium of DeWaCo Estates

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bitovia wrote:
I can agree with that, wholeheartedly. I also think word-play in itself has a major role to play in this game of deception. (i.e. People's Democratic Republic of Korea: Not Democratic or a Republic)


Agreed Smile Idea
_________________
Lord Imperator ~ CommiCzar

Peace & Prosperity




Imperial Commonwealth of the Imperium of DeWaCo Estates
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
LiquidTheBrit



Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 12
Location: Peoples Republic of New Russia

PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Erm, communism hasn't existed at all in a long time, by definition.

Communism was defined as a stateless, classless society. All of the forementioned states are states, and have class differences. Which means that none of them are classless. Way back when people lived in tiny communities and hunted for food, then yes, many of those tiny communities could be considered communist. However, nothing can really be considered as communist today. Socialist, maybe, but while nations still exist, not communist.

Course, this is just my opinion.
_________________
Genius is drawing in perspective without ever being taught how.
Stupidity is spending all of your money on an art school.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Open_Micronational Forum Index -> Rants about Macronationals All times are GMT


Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum